Login
The ICMA Information Package on Medical Abortion
available in En, Fr, Ru, Es, Pt, Ar, Hi
Acknowledgements
Information for women
Information for women's organizations and NGOs
Information for health care providers
Information for policymakers
Selected resources on medical abortion

Subscribe to News
Enter your e-mail:
Enter Check code:

Subscribe in a reader

News

Home > News > Taking Back the Reproductive Health Debate

Taking Back the Reproductive Health Debate

Source: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org

23.07.08     Steven Waldman, former editor for U.S. News and World Report and founder of Beliefnet.com, writes about the Democrat's continuing failure to take control of the abortion debate by highlighting the unpopular position of the far right on banning early-term abortions.  He argues that Dems continue to allow the right to focus on the extreme end of abortion care, late-term abortions, that constitutes only 1.4% of abortion procedures in the United States. 

Waldman does not go far enough in his critique of the Democrats, however. Democrats should work hard to put abortion its larger context of reproductive rights where it belongs.  Abortion care is only one aspect of the range of reproductive health services needed to keep people safe, healthy and in control of their lives.  Democrats should talk about the importance of comprehensive sex education and access to affordable, effective contraception as it relates to abortion.  It is easy to directly connect the dots between ensuring education and access to contraception to all Americans and reducing the need for abortions, an end that a vast majority of Americans can agree is desireable. 

If Democrats can bring the abortion debate into this larger reproductive health context they will find McCain continuing to struggle to explain his backing of anti-contraception bills and votes to continue federal funding of failed abstinence-only sex education curriculum. All the while Democrats will be seen as the party with a more cohesive and inclusive vision on these issues.

The Right's War on Contraception ... The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association has a post up examining the right's concerted attempt to get rid of birth control in the United States:

Instead, I would like to point you to the bigger picture, the one that keeps me up at night. For several years now, people have been talking about the War on Contraception, that there is a growing movement within extremely conservative circles to not only overturn a woman's right to choose abortion, but to take it even further and eliminate the right to contraception as well. These people believe that contraception is the root of all of society's evils, and that we would all be better off if women stayed home and raised babies. "Barefoot and pregnant" is practically their rallying cry.

Yet many Americans, especially American women, do not realize that one of their most fundamental and cherished rights -- the right to choose for themselves whether or when to have children -- is under attack. Unfortunately, this war is very real, and the battlefield is expanding daily. The potential HHS regulations are just the latest salvo in the War on Contraception, brought to you by our friends who hate abortion but want to limit access to common-sense measures like family planning, which reduces unintended pregnancy and thereby reduces the need for abortion.

A related article worth reading is posted on Irish newspaper The Herald's website. On the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Catholic Church's banning of contraception a former priest, Father Peter de Rosa, recalls his fight against the ban and subsequent dismissal from the church.  Toward the end of his fight against the Pope's declaration against contraception he was to be 'reduced' to a layman of the church and here de Rosa offers an ironic and stining indictment of his former church:

At my last meeting with Heenan, he asked me to go downstairs to see his auxiliary bishop. Victor was a pal of mine. He said he would apply to Rome for my reduction to the lay-state but it usually took two years. I assured him I was in no hurry to be reduced. In the event, it came within a month. Such indecent speed, I thought.

I realised later I could have remained a priest had I merely sexually abused children.

Pelosi Speaks Out Agaisnt Abstinence-only Sex Education ... Speaking at the Netroots Nation conference last week (which Bill O The Clown so absurdly called more evil than the KKK or the Nazis) Nancy Pelosi was asked about abstinence-only sex education, check out her response, in it Pelosi starts getting at what I was talking about above, linking contraception and the reduction of abortions, she says "If you want to reduce abortion you should love contraception:"

Other News

19 November 2008, India
Increase In Unplanned Pregnancies, Abortions In Indian City Linked To Ban On Over-the-Counter EC Sales

19 November 2008, Brasil
Brazilian government promotes abortion in standardized testing

18 November 2008
Opinion Pieces Examine Future Of Catholic Electorate After Strong Support For Obama

17 November 2008, Northern Ireland
Government backs off NI abortion law change

17 November 2008, Uruguay
"Iniciativas Sanitarias" position at the latest events in Uruguay

16 November 2008, El Salvador
El Salvador Rejects Anti-Family, Pro-Abortion Youth Convention

 page top Top of the page Mail to a friend Print Version  
 
Our sponsors  
Swedish International
Development Agency
Departament for International Development
Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Dutch Ministry
of Foreign Affairs
 


About us | Activities | Membership | Resources | News | Contacts | Sitemap
The ICMA Information Package on Medical Abortion: Acknowledgements | Information for women | Information for women's organizations and NGOs | Information for health care providers | Information for policymakers | Selected resources on medical abortion

Webmaster : webmaster@medicalabortionconsortium.org

©2005-2008, International Consortium for Medical Abortion