Laws on Abortion in the First and Second Trimester

Home > Laws on Abortion in the First and Second Trimester

Reed Boland,
Research Associate
Harvard School of Public Health

Memorandum on the legality of 2nd trimester abortions in the countries of the world 

 The following is a list which contains all of the countries in the world with their legal indications for 2nd trimester (and later) abortions, as well as provider and location requirements when indicated in the legal texts.  The list also indicates countries where medical abortion is authorized, although in most cases there is little information as to what point in pregnancy medical abortion is allowed. 
The list should be interpreted keeping in mind the following:
 
1) in the vast majority of cases, the information included in the list is based on the actual wording of the laws and regulations.  In the case of countries for which the legal texts were not available for examination, the word “unclear” follows the country.   In some cases information provided by IPPF was used.  However, this information is not always complete and occasionally may not be accurate.  Similarly, with respect to medical abortion, much information (included in parentheses) was taken from the Gnuity Health Projects website:  http://gynuity.org.  It has not been verified independently.
 
2) it is sometimes difficult to determine from the legal texts the time limits set for abortions performed after the 1st trimester.  Many countries do not establish such time limits.  In these cases the words “not specified” are used.  Other countries, while not setting time limits, include provisions in their laws from which time limits can be inferred, such as defining “abortion” as a procedure carried out before viability or specifying limits for certain indications, but not for others.  In such cases the word “implied” follows the presumed time limit.  Finally in some cases, the wording of the text is simply not clear or is very convoluted.  The information in the list reflects the best judgment of the compiler.       
 
3) with respect to the “health” indication, the wording of the texts themselves has been largely followed.  Therefore, the term “mental health” is only used when a text employs that word.  In addition, the nature of the health indication varies widely in the laws.  Sometimes it is meant generally as any threat to health, while on other occasions a law may state that an abortion is allowed only if it is the only way to prevent serious and permanent harm to health.  Before statements about the nature of threat to health required in a particular country for an abortion to be legal, the text of the law should be consulted.
 
4) the words “life (implied on the ground of necessity)” are used to describe the indications for abortion for some countries.  This means that although the laws of those countries do not explicitly allow an abortion to be performed for any reasons, they are usually interpreted as permitting an abortion to save the life of the pregnant woman on the grounds of “necessity.”  That is, an act which is usually considered illegal may be legally performed if needed to protect a greater good.  A violent act carried out in self-defense is an example, as is abortion.  In the case of abortion the embryo/fetus is destroyed in order to save the life of the pregnant woman.

For more information please access "Abortion laws of the different countries"  - http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/abortion/abortionlaws.htm .

Legal requirements for the performance abortions after the 1st trimester

Africa

 Algeria  Angola  Benin
 Botswana  Burkina Faso  Burundi
 Cameroon  Central African Republic  Chad
 Comoros  Congo  Djibouti
 Egypt  Equatorial Guinea  Eritrea
 Ethiopia  Gabon  Gambia
 Ghana  Guinea  Kenya
 Lesotho  Liberia  Madagascar
 Malawi  Mali  Mauritania
 Mauritius  Morocco  Mozambique
 Namibia  Niger  Nigeria
 Rwanda  Senegal  Seychelles
 Sierra Leone  South Africa  Sudan
 Swaziland  Togo  Tunisia

Asia

 Afghanistan  Bahrain  Bangladesh
 Bhutan  Brunei Darussalam  Cambodia
 China  Hong Kong  India
 Indonesia  Iran, Islamic Republic of  Iraq
 Israel  Japan  Jordan
 Korea, Republic of  Kuwait  Lebanon
 Malaysia  Mongolia  Myanmar
 Nepal  Oman  Pakistan
 Philippines  Qatar  Saudi Arabia
 Singapore  Sri Lanka  Syrian Arab Republic
 Thailand  Viet Nam

Australia and Oceania

 Cook Islands  Fiji  Kiribati
 Nauru  New Zealand  Papua New Guinea
 Samoa  Tonga  Tuvalu

Central America

 Antigua and Barbuda  Cayman Islands  Luxembourg
 Macao  Montserrat  Tajikistan
 Uganda  United Arab Emirates  Vanuatu
 Venezuela  Yemen  Zambia
 Zimbabwe

Eastern and Central Europe

 Albania  Armenia  Azerbaijan
 Belarus  Bosnia and Herzegovina  Bulgaria
 Croatia  Cyprus  Czech Republic
 Estonia  Georgia  Hungary
 Kazakhstan  Kyrgyzstan  Latvia
 Lithuania  Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of  Moldova, Republic of
 Poland  Romania  Russian Federation
 Serbia and Montenegro  Slovakia  Slovenia
 Uzbekistan

North America

 Bahamas  Barbados  Canada
 Costa Rica  El Salvador  Grenada
 Guatemala  Haiti  Jamaica
 Nicaragua  Panama  Saint Kitts and Nevis
 Saint Lucia  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Trinidad and Tobago
 United States

South America

 Anguilla  Argentina  Aruba
 Belize  Bolivia  Brazil
 Chile  Colombia  Ecuador
 Guyana  Honduras  Paraguay
 Peru  Uruguay

Western Europe

 Andorra  Austria  Belgium
 Denmark  Finland  France
 Germany  Greece  Iceland
 Ireland  Italy  Liechtenstein
 Malta  Monaco  Netherlands
 Norway  Portugal  San Marino
 Spain  Sweden  Switzerland
 Turkey  United Kingdom