Laws on Abortion in the First and Second Trimester

Home > Laws on Abortion in the First and Second Trimester

Reed Boland,
Research Associate
Harvard School of Public Health

Memorandum on the legality of 2nd trimester abortions in the countries of the world 

 The following is a list which contains all of the countries in the world with their legal indications for 2nd trimester (and later) abortions, as well as provider and location requirements when indicated in the legal texts.  The list also indicates countries where medical abortion is authorized, although in most cases there is little information as to what point in pregnancy medical abortion is allowed. 
The list should be interpreted keeping in mind the following:
 
1) in the vast majority of cases, the information included in the list is based on the actual wording of the laws and regulations.  In the case of countries for which the legal texts were not available for examination, the word “unclear” follows the country.   In some cases information provided by IPPF was used.  However, this information is not always complete and occasionally may not be accurate.  Similarly, with respect to medical abortion, much information (included in parentheses) was taken from the Gnuity Health Projects website:  http://gynuity.org.  It has not been verified independently.
 
2) it is sometimes difficult to determine from the legal texts the time limits set for abortions performed after the 1st trimester.  Many countries do not establish such time limits.  In these cases the words “not specified” are used.  Other countries, while not setting time limits, include provisions in their laws from which time limits can be inferred, such as defining “abortion” as a procedure carried out before viability or specifying limits for certain indications, but not for others.  In such cases the word “implied” follows the presumed time limit.  Finally in some cases, the wording of the text is simply not clear or is very convoluted.  The information in the list reflects the best judgment of the compiler.       
 
3) with respect to the “health” indication, the wording of the texts themselves has been largely followed.  Therefore, the term “mental health” is only used when a text employs that word.  In addition, the nature of the health indication varies widely in the laws.  Sometimes it is meant generally as any threat to health, while on other occasions a law may state that an abortion is allowed only if it is the only way to prevent serious and permanent harm to health.  Before statements about the nature of threat to health required in a particular country for an abortion to be legal, the text of the law should be consulted.
 
4) the words “life (implied on the ground of necessity)” are used to describe the indications for abortion for some countries.  This means that although the laws of those countries do not explicitly allow an abortion to be performed for any reasons, they are usually interpreted as permitting an abortion to save the life of the pregnant woman on the grounds of “necessity.”  That is, an act which is usually considered illegal may be legally performed if needed to protect a greater good.  A violent act carried out in self-defense is an example, as is abortion.  In the case of abortion the embryo/fetus is destroyed in order to save the life of the pregnant woman.

For more information please access "Abortion laws of the different countries"  - http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/abortion/abortionlaws.htm .

Legal requirements for the performance abortions after the 1st trimester

Africa

 Algeria  Angola  Benin
 Botswana  Burkina Faso  Burundi
 Cameroon  Central African Republic  Chad
 Comoros  Congo  Djibouti
 Egypt  Equatorial Guinea  Eritrea
 Ethiopia  Gabon  Gambia
 Ghana  Guinea  Kenya
 Lesotho  Liberia  Malawi
 Mali  Mauritania  Mauritius
 Morocco  Mozambique  Namibia
 Niger  Nigeria  Rwanda
 Senegal  Seychelles  Sierra Leone
 South Africa  Sudan  Swaziland
 Togo  Tunisia  Uganda
 Zambia  Zimbabwe

Asia

 Afghanistan  Azerbaijan  Bangladesh
 Bhutan  Brunei  Cambodia
 China  Cyprus  Hong Kong
 India  Indonesia  Iran, Islamic Republic of
 Iraq  Israel  Japan
 Jordan  Kazakhstan  Korea, Republic of
 Kuwait  Kyrgyzstan  Lebanon
 Macau  Malaysia  Mongolia
 Myanmar  Nepal  Oman
 Pakistan  Philippines  Qatar
 Saudi Arabia  Singapore  Sri Lanka
 Syrian Arab Republic  Tajikistan  Thailand
 Turkey  United Arab Emirates  Uzbekistan
 Viet Nam

Australia and Oceania

 Cook Islands  Fiji  Kiribati
 Nauru  New Zealand  Papua New Guinea
 Samoa  Tonga  Vanuatu

Central America

 Bahrain  Madagascar  Tuvalu
 Yemen

Eastern and Central Europe

 Albania  Armenia  Belarus
 Bosnia and Herzegovina  Bulgaria  Croatia
 Czech Republic  Estonia  Georgia
 Hungary  Latvia  Lithuania
 Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of  Moldova, Republic of  Poland
 Romania  Russian Federation  Serbia and Montenegro
 Slovakia  Slovenia

North America

 Anguilla  Antigua and Barbuda  Aruba
 Bahamas  Barbados  Belize
 Canada  Cayman Islands  Costa Rica
 El Salvador  Grenada  Guatemala
 Haiti  Honduras  Jamaica
 Montserrat  Nicaragua  Panama
 Saint Kitts and Nevis  Saint Lucia  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
 Trinidad and Tobago  United States

South America

 Argentina  Bolivia  Brazil
 Chile  Colombia  Ecuador
 Guyana  Paraguay  Peru
 Uruguay  Venezuela

Western Europe

 Andorra  Austria  Belgium
 Denmark  Finland  France
 Germany  Greece  Iceland
 Ireland  Italy  Liechtenstein
 Luxembourg  Malta  Monaco
 Netherlands  Norway  Portugal
 San Marino  Spain  Sweden
 Switzerland  United Kingdom